Understand sending configuration
See which rules and keys your domain publishes and which settings need a closer technical review.
See what your domain publishes about email sending and transport protection. Wolf-Agents checks features including SPF, discoverable DKIM keys, DMARC and signals from reachable mail servers. The results explain potential issues and measurement gaps.
The tool checks domain configuration. It does not read mailboxes, scan attachments or guarantee message delivery. Results, report files and optional result emails are currently in German.
Free report beta: no Wolf-Agents account and no email address required.
See which rules and keys your domain publishes and which settings need a closer technical review.
Check selected DNS and reachable mail-server signals. Incomplete measurements remain clearly identified.
Discuss specific findings with your internal IT team or provider. The report records the scan results for that discussion.
| Area | What the check says |
|---|---|
| SPF | Published email-sending rules and selected configuration features |
| DKIM | Discoverable DNS keys using a limited selector search; not proof that every message is correctly signed |
| DMARC | The published domain policy and its configuration |
| Mail servers and transport | Selected MX, SMTP/TLS and transport-protection signals, where reachable and measurable |
| Further DNS security features | Domain features within the relevant scope, depending on domain use and available measurements |
SPF, DKIM and DMARC work together but serve different purposes. A DNS record alone does not prove that every sending service is configured correctly or every message passes its expected checks.
The domain check does not read real messages or examine mailboxes, login credentials, attachments, spam filters or the reputation of every sending IP address. It does not prove general protection against phishing or guarantee deliverability.
The DKIM selector search is limited. A key that is not found does not prove the domain never uses DKIM. The signature and alignment of a particular message need to be assessed using that message.
Modern email security rests on several protocols that work together. Here you can read what each protocol does, how it works and which problems typically come up.
SPF publishes rules for which systems may use a domain as an SMTP sender. This means the envelope sender domain or the HELO identity, not automatically the visible From address.
The receiving server evaluates the SPF rules of that domain against the IP address of the sending server. Rules can also point to further DNS lookups. DMARC additionally considers alignment with the visible sender domain.
DKIM lets a sending service digitally sign selected message headers and the message body. The recipient checks the signature against a published DNS key.
The DKIM signature names the signing domain and a selector. That is how the recipient finds the public key in DNS. The domain check looks for those keys; it does not verify the signature of a real message.
DMARC ties the visible sender domain to the SPF and DKIM results and publishes a policy for how failures are to be handled.
DMARC passes when at least one successful SPF or DKIM check is aligned with the visible sender domain. The policy can ask for none, quarantine or reject; receiving systems also apply rules of their own. Reports from participating recipients can help with the analysis.
BIMI publishes a pointer to a brand logo for email services that support it. An existing DNS record guarantees neither that the logo is shown nor that a verification marker appears.
Whether the logo is shown depends on the DMARC configuration, the logo format and the rules of the receiving service. Depending on the service, additional certificates are required. The domain check grants no trade mark or certificate approval.
MTA-STS publishes requirements for TLS connections to the receiving mail servers of a domain. They are enforced by sending systems that support the standard.
A DNS record under _mta-sts points to the current policy version; an HTTPS file under /.well-known/mta-sts.txt describes the mode and the permitted MX hosts. In enforce mode, supporting senders are meant to use only matching encrypted connections. This is not end-to-end encryption.
TLS-RPT lets supporting senders deliver reports about successful or failed TLS connections to your domain.
A DNS record under _smtp._tls sets the report destinations by email or HTTPS. Supporting senders can send aggregated JSON reports. The Wolf-Agents domain check examines the published configuration; it does not collect or analyse those reports.
Setup and troubleshooting: Email security guides (German). How the parts fit together: DMARC and identifier alignment.
The email report documents the checked domain configuration, findings, explanations and coverage notes. Save the PDF, add your own notes in DOCX or continue working with the findings table in CSV.
The available report files are free during the beta, with no email address required. Domains that do not send email also receive PDF, DOCX and CSV reports when the result could be stored for download; the report then uses the separate scope for non-sending domains.
Sending a report by email is optional and unlocks no further content. Save the files you need locally: you can only download them again while the corresponding result is still available.
No. You enter a domain. The tool examines its public configuration and selected signals from reachable mail servers. It is not an antivirus, attachment or mailbox scanner.
Yes, within the scope described here. SPF and DMARC are assessed using published domain information. DKIM keys must be reachable through a discoverable selector. The limited search may not find every key in use.
The selector may fall outside the search, a DNS record may be missing or the lookup may be limited. Check the actual selector used by your sending service; you can enter custom names in the advanced options. A missing result alone does not prove that your messages lack DKIM signatures. Conversely, an existing _domainkey namespace alone proves neither a public key nor a verified message signature.
No. Delivery also depends on factors this check does not assess, including message content, reputation, sending practices and recipient rules. The result evaluates selected configuration features of your domain.
It checks domain information, not real sent messages. Whether SPF or DKIM aligns with the visible sender domain for a particular message must be assessed using that message and its authentication results.
Yes. It has a separate assessment, with a different scope from a sending domain. When the result could be stored for download, PDF, DOCX and CSV are available for it as well. An unmeasured item is not a passed test.
No. DMARC aggregate reports are messages from receiving systems about email they have observed. Our report documents a technical domain check at a particular time. It does not collect or analyse your DMARC aggregate reports.
Our email security guides — German cover specific configuration tasks, including SPF at STRATO — German, DKIM at Netcup — German and SMTP TLS at Hetzner — German.